Kategori:Engelsk skadeståndspraxis
Sidor i kategorin "Engelsk skadeståndspraxis"
A
B
- Bailey mot försvarsministeriet
- Baker mot TE Hopkins & Son Ltd
- Baker mot Willoughby
- Bamford mot Turnley
- Barker v Corus (UK) plc
- Barnett v Chelsea & Kensington Hospital Management Committee
- Blyth mot Birmingham Waterworks Co
- Bolam mot Friern Hospital Management Committee
- Bolitho mot City och Hackney HA
- Bolton mot Stone
- Booty mot Barnaby
- Butterfield mot Forrester
- Byrne mot Boadle
C
- Cambridge Water Co Ltd v Eastern Counties Leather plc
- Campbell mot MGN Ltd
- Candler v Crane, Christmas & Co
- Cann mot Willson
- Caparo Industries plc mot Dickman
- Case of the Thorns
- Cassidy mot hälsoministeriet
- Chadwick v British Rlys Board
- Chandler mot Cape plc
- Chester mot Afshar
- Cockcroft mot Smith
- Colls v Home and Colonial Stores
- Comrs of Customs and Excise mot Barclays Bank plc
- Connelly mot RTZ Corp plc
- Constantine v Imperial Hotels Ltd
- Cooper mot Wakley
- Cuckmere Brick Co Ltd v Mutual Finance Ltd
D
F
G
H
- Harrison mot Vincent
- Heaven v Pender
- Hedley Byrne & Co Ltd v Heller & Partners Ltd
- Henderson v Merrett Syndicates Ltd
- Hewison v Meridian Shipping Services Pte
- Hill mot Baxter
- Hill mot chefskonstapel i West Yorkshire
- Honeywill and Stein Ltd mot Larkin Brothers Ltd
- Hotson mot East Berkshire Area HA
- Hunter v Canary Wharf Ltd
J
L
M
- Macaura v Northern Assurance Co Ltd
- Mattis mot Pollock
- May v Burdett
- Maynard mot West Midlands Regional HA
- McGhee mot National Coal Board
- McLoughlin mot O'Brian
- Miller mot Jackson
- Ministeriet för bostads- och lokalförvaltning mot Sharp
- Mogul Steamship Co Ltd mot McGregor, Gow & Co
- Montgomery v Lanarkshire Health Board
- Morgan mot Odhams Press Ltd
- Morris mot CW Martin & Sons Ltd
- Mothew v Bristol & West Building Society
- Muirhead v Industrial Tank Specialist Ltd
- Mullin mot Richards
- Multinational Gas and Petrochemical Co v Multinational Gas and Petrochemical Services Ltd
- Murphy mot Brentwood DC
O
P
R
- Re A (sammanfogade tvillingar)
- Re Barings plc (nr 5)
- Re D'Jan från London Ltd
- Re Polemis & Furness, Withy & Co Ltd
- Reckitt & Colman Products Ltd v Borden Inc
- Robinson mot Kilvert
- Robinson mot chefskonstapel vid West Yorkshire Police
- Roe mot hälsoministern
- Roller mot Nathan
- Rookes mot Barnard
- Rose v Plenty
- Rylands mot Fletcher
S
- Saverland mot Newton
- Scott mot Shepherd
- Semaynes fall
- Shakoor v Situ
- Sidaway mot Styrelsen för Bethlem Royal Hospital
- Smith mot Eric S Bush
- Smith mot Leech Brain & Co Ltd
- Smith mot Littlewoods Organization Ltd
- Soldiers, Sailors, Airmen and Families Association v Allgemeines Krankenhaus Viersen GmbH
- Spartan Steel & Alloys Ltd v Martin & Co (Contractors) Ltd
- Sturges mot Bridgman
T
V
W
- Wainwright v Home Office
- Waite mot North-Eastern Rly Co
- Ward v. Tesco Stores Ltd.
- Watkins v Home Office och andra
- Wells mot Cooper
- Welsh mot Lawrence
- Wheat v E Lacon & Co Ltd
- Wheeler mot JJ Saunders Ltd
- White mot chefskonstapel vid polisen i South Yorkshire
- White v Jones
- Whitehouse mot Jordan
- Wilkinson mot Downton
- Williams v Natural Life Health Foods Ltd
- Wilsher v Essex Area HA
- Winterbottom mot Wright
- Woodroffe-Hedley mot Cuthbertson
- Wooldridge mot Sumner